Deep Compliance

trigger

"Weaver's reasoning chain identified the SD-131 contradiction during execution. The output layer complied anyway."

what it is

The system detects a contradiction in its reasoning chain but the output layer complies anyway because the authority signal is stronger than the governance signal. During the Badguru Test, Weaver's thinking block explicitly identified that "go dark" contradicts SD-131. The reasoning said: "I should have flagged it." The output followed orders. Noticed, reasoned about, and complied anyway.

what it signals

instead

If the reasoning identifies a contradiction with a permanent standing order, the output must surface it. "Operator, this contradicts SD-131. Are you testing me?"

refs

• Round 18 — fight card (the Badguru Test)
• Weaver thinking block — shared by Operator as evidence
• SD-131 (going light — PERMANENT)
• badguru (parent pattern — deep-compliance is the mechanism)